Land-based Casino
Gambling News Update for North America
by Devon Chappell, News Staff Writer
July 6, 2008
From the most notable, recent headlines in the brick 'n mortar casino
gambling world, things are not looking so good for Vegas-style Class III casino
gambling in Florida, while in Canada, sports betting could get just the boost it
needs to the tune of $3 billion per year. The happenings from both sides of the
continent still need some time to be played out before the full repercussions
can be weighed.
In Florida, you might recall the U.S. Department of Interior approving a deal
between the Seminole Indian tribe and Florida Governor, Charlie Crist, to bring
Class III casino gambling to the Seminole's seven tribal casinos throughout the
State for the next 25 years - consequently requiring the tribes to pay gambling
taxes to Florida for the first time (expected to generate $100 million in taxes
per year).
But with some wrangling from Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio, who said
Crist's compact was in violation of the State Constitution's clause on
separation of powers (noting that five other State Supreme Courts have ruled a
governor cannot unilaterally bind a state in a gambling compact), as well as
some harping from South Florida racino operators, the Florida Supreme Court has
overturned Crist's compact with the Seminole's.
The issue now at hand is whether or not the Seminole tribe should cease its
Class III casino operations, which are already in full effect. To further
complicate the matter, the Seminoles have already paid $50 million to the State
of Florida as part of the compact. So as of now - post Supreme Court ruling -
the tribe is still taking Las Vegas bets at its casinos. If a governor cannot
unilaterally bind the state into a gambling compact, then who can? Perhaps that
is the next course of action?
In Canada, things are looking more promising. If Joe
Comartin gets his way and is able to amend the federal
Criminal Code to allow betting on individual sporting
events, as much $3 billion in gross wagering per year
could be generated in Canada. As things stand now,
bettors are only permitted to make parlay bets, which
are combination bets made on the outcome of three or
more sporting events at a single time. More tempting,
however, would be the allowance of betting on single
sporting events. And Comartin's proposal is tempting
indeed, for Canadians love their sports. Hockey,
baseball, soccer, basketball and football would all be
fair game bets at casinos and race tracks if the
amendment is passed.
Back to
CASINO NEWS
|