<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Player Trust: Weeding out the Not-so-Good Online Casinos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/building-player-trust-weeding-out-the-not-so-good-online-casinos/164/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/building-player-trust-weeding-out-the-not-so-good-online-casinos/164/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:34:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/building-player-trust-weeding-out-the-not-so-good-online-casinos/164/comment-page-1/#comment-5986</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/?p=164#comment-5986</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post, Greg.

This may be so about new management...but you said it yourself &quot;the current owners either stuck up (fake accreditation) naively or were stupid enough to stick it up&quot;. That doesn&#039;t sound like the type of management I would like to open an account under.

In regards to Aqua, all of this info about the 888 buyout means nothing when Aqua still has this posted on their website: http://www.aquagaming.com/bingo.html. It especially means nothing to the common player. That looks like a bingo solution to me. If Aqua doesn&#039;t want misreporting, they should clean up shop.

We&#039;re not telling them how to run their business, but if you ask me, promoting a casino (Dream Rich), which in effect, is serving to download another casino (Windows) - making every attempt to withold that info mind you - is anything but transparent, and raises doubts. Many people would consider it unethical. There is nothing to be gained by using the mirror site. It comes across as if they are hiding something.

Greg, are you a supporter of raising transparency standards in this business or against it?

As soon as Aqua/Windows makes a professional effort to clean up their websites - the mirror to the rest of the world - of course we will be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, considering their past track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post, Greg.</p>
<p>This may be so about new management&#8230;but you said it yourself &#8220;the current owners either stuck up (fake accreditation) naively or were stupid enough to stick it up&#8221;. That doesn&#8217;t sound like the type of management I would like to open an account under.</p>
<p>In regards to Aqua, all of this info about the 888 buyout means nothing when Aqua still has this posted on their website: <a href="http://www.aquagaming.com/bingo.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aquagaming.com/bingo.html</a>. It especially means nothing to the common player. That looks like a bingo solution to me. If Aqua doesn&#8217;t want misreporting, they should clean up shop.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not telling them how to run their business, but if you ask me, promoting a casino (Dream Rich), which in effect, is serving to download another casino (Windows) &#8211; making every attempt to withold that info mind you &#8211; is anything but transparent, and raises doubts. Many people would consider it unethical. There is nothing to be gained by using the mirror site. It comes across as if they are hiding something.</p>
<p>Greg, are you a supporter of raising transparency standards in this business or against it?</p>
<p>As soon as Aqua/Windows makes a professional effort to clean up their websites &#8211; the mirror to the rest of the world &#8211; of course we will be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, considering their past track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Gomes</title>
		<link>http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/building-player-trust-weeding-out-the-not-so-good-online-casinos/164/comment-page-1/#comment-4909</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/?p=164#comment-4909</guid>
		<description>Your whole thought process here is admirable but the example that you have used is flawed. 

Windows Casino has had many issues when it was on the RTG and when it was not owned by Aquagaming. That means the previous owners a bunch of Hungarians ran it into the ground.  The Aquagaming group have managed to clear the casino and many player issues up and have moved it to a different software platform. 
I am not to sure what the issue is with the mirror sites , what next are you going to be telling them how to run their business ? If i was you i would get my facts straight before publishing what is patently something that is not correct .  

In addition there is no such thing as the Aqua Bingo solution - Aqua sold their bingo operation to 888 and then recently sold their bingo rooms to 888 as well. Can you imagine that - selling bingo twice for £100 million in total to the same group. Does this sound like a bunch of shysters to you? 

The one thing that you have got right are the diodgy awards and it is quite easy to see that this was some kind of stupid commission that the old owners set up and that the current owners either stuck up naively or were stupid enough to stick it up . see the link below for the old commission site : 

http://web.archive.org/web/20040614125550/http://www.gamblingcommission.org/ 

This is possibly one of the most inaccurate articles I have ever come across . I will be pointing this article out to the owners of the group and I am sure that they might have a thing or two to say about the inaccuracies in your article. 

BTW – You can confirm what I have said above re the issues with Windows on RTG with Bryan Bailey of Casinomeister and various other places .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your whole thought process here is admirable but the example that you have used is flawed. </p>
<p>Windows Casino has had many issues when it was on the RTG and when it was not owned by Aquagaming. That means the previous owners a bunch of Hungarians ran it into the ground.  The Aquagaming group have managed to clear the casino and many player issues up and have moved it to a different software platform.<br />
I am not to sure what the issue is with the mirror sites , what next are you going to be telling them how to run their business ? If i was you i would get my facts straight before publishing what is patently something that is not correct .  </p>
<p>In addition there is no such thing as the Aqua Bingo solution &#8211; Aqua sold their bingo operation to 888 and then recently sold their bingo rooms to 888 as well. Can you imagine that &#8211; selling bingo twice for £100 million in total to the same group. Does this sound like a bunch of shysters to you? </p>
<p>The one thing that you have got right are the diodgy awards and it is quite easy to see that this was some kind of stupid commission that the old owners set up and that the current owners either stuck up naively or were stupid enough to stick it up . see the link below for the old commission site : </p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040614125550/http://www.gamblingcommission.org/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20040614125550/http://www.gamblingcommission.org/</a> </p>
<p>This is possibly one of the most inaccurate articles I have ever come across . I will be pointing this article out to the owners of the group and I am sure that they might have a thing or two to say about the inaccuracies in your article. </p>
<p>BTW – You can confirm what I have said above re the issues with Windows on RTG with Bryan Bailey of Casinomeister and various other places .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arron Hershman</title>
		<link>http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/building-player-trust-weeding-out-the-not-so-good-online-casinos/164/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Arron Hershman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinecasinosuite.com/casino-blog/?p=164#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>Less is the new-fangled more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less is the new-fangled more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

